If you’ve been wondering whether AI is about to take over the world of programming and make your skills obsolete — you’re not alone. The media is full of loud headlines predicting the end of coding jobs. But let’s take a step back and look at the bigger picture.
Here’s why I believe AI won’t replace programmers — it will empower them.
1. AI is a Tool — You Are the Force Behind It
Like every tool in history, AI is a force multiplier. But here’s the thing: if you multiply by zero, you still get zero. Without a skilled programmer guiding it, AI produces nonsense or — worse — confidently wrong answers.
I used to spend 30 minutes digging through 15 StackOverflow threads to fix a niche bug. Now, I can describe the problem to an AI assistant and get suggestions in seconds. That’s a huge boost in productivity. But it only works because I know how to assess the suggestions, tweak the code, and validate the solution.
AI doesn't replace my expertise. It just helps me get more done with it.
2. It’s Not Magic — It’s Just a Smarter Google
Think of AI like a very advanced search engine that’s learned how to autocomplete your thoughts. It can generate boilerplate code and offer useful hints — but it doesn’t understand context like a human does. It has no intuition, no real sense of system design, and certainly no accountability.
You still need to know what you’re building, how to structure it, how to test it, and how to maintain it. AI can help you write code, but it can’t replace your ability to think through code.
3. We’ve Been Here Before: CAD Didn’t Replace Engineers
When Computer-Aided Design (CAD) arrived, people predicted the end of civil engineering jobs. But CAD didn’t replace engineers — it helped them design more complex structures faster and with fewer mistakes.
AI is having the same effect on programming. It’s not removing the need for programmers — it’s removing the busywork that gets in their way. That opens up time for higher-level problem-solving, creativity, and building better software.
4. History Repeats: Virtualization Didn’t Kill Sysadmins
When virtualization and cloud computing arrived, people claimed it would eliminate system administrator jobs. And sure, large sysadmin teams got smaller — but suddenly, thousands more companies could afford to deploy infrastructure. That exploded demand for IT professionals who knew how to manage modern systems.
The same thing is happening with AI. It lowers the technical barrier to entry — which means more companies will start building software, and they’ll need you to help make it work properly.
5. The Hype Serves Shareholders — Not Reality
A lot of the panic around AI replacing jobs comes from media narratives and corporate boardrooms. These stories often originate from people who benefit from replacing employees with tools. But what they don’t mention is how often these tools fail without skilled humans involved.
No company is going to let an AI deploy core systems or write production code without oversight. And who provides that oversight? You.
So What Should You Do?
If you’re learning Python or improving your programming skills — keep going. You’re on the right track. But don’t ignore AI either. Learn how to use it to your advantage. Let it handle the boring stuff so you can focus on the creative, human side of coding — designing systems, solving problems, and making real-world impact.
You’re not being replaced. You’re being enhanced.
The programmers who thrive in the AI era will be the ones who know how to collaborate with these tools — not compete with them.
Let’s keep building.
Ardit
Tim O'Reilly's keynote/intro for OReilly's AI Codecon last week was pretty great. He talked about prior disruptors to the industry, each of which was preceded by warnings of the irreparable damage that we could expect. In every single case though; by making the field more approachable, MORE people were able to engage with programming and more advancements were made universally as there were new problems to solve and new ways to solve them. We also see the benefits of engineers from other industries bringing new eyes to old problems; and even more people looking for bespoke solutions to problems that have previously been handled offline.
There are real dangers more people need to be made aware of, but the real creative problem solving value that programmers deliver is not going anywhere.